It comes after it was revealed that the U.S. Police Department was working with a tech company to analyze user data to aid in crime investigations. The creation and use of fraudulent accounts is prohibited on Facebook. The aim was to “establish a safe workplace where people can trust each other and hold each other accountable,” the statement said.
In a letter outlining Facebook’s policies, Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Civil Rights Roy Austin wrote: The policies simply allow officers to create fake accounts for “online investigative activity.”
âWhile the LAPD can determine the legality of such policies, agents should follow Facebook’s policies when creating accounts on our services. Any activity on Facebook involving the use of fake accounts, identity theft, and collection of data for surveillance purposes should be stopped by the police.
The LAPD used Voyager Labs social media monitoring software to acquire social media data from suspects, including their friends’ accounts, according to documents obtained through public registration requests submitted by the Brennan Center for Justice. Voyager Labs says its software can analyze huge volumes of data to aid in crime investigations, including determining user motivations and opinions.
The program had been found to be particularly beneficial in analyzing online street gang operations and important in helping the LAPD’s robbery and homicide section gather evidence, according to LAPD emails. Facebook says spying on users and pretending to be legitimate users is inconsistent with the company’s mission, which is to allow individuals to “connect and share with real people using their real identities.”
False names, according to Robert Potter, an Australian security expert specializing in legitimate surveillance, may be allowed in cases where human rights defenders or journalists want to protect their anonymity online, or for users in countries where the internet is censored. And he is shocked by the social media giant’s tough stance against the LAPD, given that it has been slow to act on issues such as bogus political ads, online fraud and the damaging effects of social media on people. young people in the past. Despite its claims of authenticity and accountability, Facebook blocked the accounts of American academics who analyzed political ads on its site in August.
Facebook claimed that the academics’ data recovery browser extension tool jeopardized its security, while the academics argued their work was essential to maintaining democracy and the transparency of the social network’s policies.
Mr Potter, who built the Washington Post’s cybersecurity operations center and advised the Australian government on cybersecurity, said: Strong grounds for cracking down on legitimate use of the platform.
âIf you run a social media network, you are not unique. Why should a social networking site be any different? There’s no rule that says you can’t have a cop undercover in a church, so why should a social media platform be any different? “